Résumé
Background/Rationale: In the last 2 decades, domestic and global service-learning have flourished in higher education. Although positive academic and personal outcomes have been demonstrated (Choo et al., 2018), critics point to evidence of negative outcomes that perpetuate existing systems of class, privilege, & norms of harmful disparities (Augustine et al., 2017). Experiential learning can reinforce deficit-based views of marginalized groups, stereotypes, and privileged perspectives. For example, global service-learning has a long history of volunteering in residential care institutions (“orphanages), primarily in lower resourced, developing countries, perpetuating inequitable and harmful systems of care (Rotabi et al., 2017). Sigmon’s (1970) reciprocal service-learning approach between student learner and host community and the influences of Paulo Freire (1973) aim to “
overcome the usual power differentials established in the donor/recipient relationship” (Tapia, 2003, p. 145). As a pedagogical method, students develop solidarity through service to the real needs of the community, improve academic learning, and encourage the formation of personal values and responsible citizenship (Tapia, 2003). Fair Trade Learning’s reciprocity in goals and relationships (Prado et al., 2014) and justice-oriented service-learning’s community nurturing practices (Augustine et al., 2017) further inform decolonized global service-learning approaches. Methods/Methodology: Using a case study approach, this presentation identifies approaches to global service-learning applied to field education that integrates reciprocity (Tapia, 2003) and liberatory consciousness (Love, 2018) aimed to increase awareness and actions that challenge inequitable educational practices. Reflective practices, defined as the “intentional consideration of an experience in light of particular learning objectives,” are key for fostering moral development and strengthening critical thinking in service-learning. Results/Conclusions: Reflective practices that are regular, use multiple modalities, and structured toward student goals (engagement, empathy, communication, research-informed practice), critical for identifying discrepancies and barriers to justice-oriented learning goals (Hatcher et al., 2004; Clayton and Ash, 2009), will be explored.
Mots clés (séparés par des virgules)
field education, decolonizing global service-learning