Résumé
Context: As a result of colonial policies and traumatic experiences (CRPA, 1995; CVRC, 2015; ENFFADA, 2019), First Nations, Inuit and Métis individuals experience more psychological, spiritual and social distress than non-Indigenous people (Bombay et al., 2014 ; INSPQ, 2021 ; Kirmayer et al., 2009 ; Maté, 2022). In response to the exponential growth of requests for distress assistance amongst the general population (80 % of all calls to police), and the limitations of police intervention methods with Indigenous people (CERP, 2019), four pilot EMIPIC (hybrid teams composed of police and community responders) were deployed in Quebec (Canada) as of March 2022. Objectives: The study aims to elucidate
what are the foundations and memorandum of understanding of hybrid teams and their implications for culturally safe intervention with Indigenous people in distress? Four main objectives are pursued: (1) understanding the reality and needs (mental wellness) of the Indigenous members interviewed; (2) identifying the extent to which their conception of balance and mental wellness is recognized and valued by the EMIPIC; (3) apprehending how the Indigenous participants felt during the intervention; and (4) describing how they perceived the nature of the services promulgated by the EMIPIC. Method and results: The authors conducted a scoping review on hybrid practices with Indigenous people, based on a scientific and media corpus. In addition, preliminary analysis of qualitative data collected to shed light on the experiences of twenty (n = 20) Indigenous members (essentially anishinabeg – algonquins) from the Maniwaki, Kitigan Zibi and Lac Barrière regions, who were in contact with an EMIPIC in the event of psychological, spiritual, or social distress, are exposed. Discussion: Implications for research and intervention, and recommendations are identified for the renewal of promising practices in the field.
Mots clés (séparés par des virgules)
Hybrid Intervention Teams, Holistic Wellness, Indigenous People, Urban Environment, Cultural Safety, Renewal of Practices